Invasive plants: like pouring oil on water – and setting it on fire.

August 29, 2009 § 9 Comments

My heart goes out to all of you dwelling on the edge of the San Gabriel Mountains, who are either in the evacuation zones or in the smoke zone.  This is a difficult time for all.

These fires are pounding the canyons above some of my favorite waterway haunts.  Up Azusa Canyon, the Morris fire burns around the Morris Dam, which sits on the upper San Gabriel River.  My friends and I shook our heads in disbelief years ago when we saw the Mountain Cove development go in, right in the floodway of of the SGR; now I shake my ahead again, this must be one of LA’s most miserable places to be right now.  To the west, the Station Fire burns above the Arroyo Seco, heading now up Millard Canyon, having run through Brown’s Canyon – as well as over the ridge to the west and into the heights above Tujunga (and thank you, Meredith McKenzie, for the FB updates on its movement).

We all know what this means – come winter, there will be debris flows.  But that’s not what I’m writing about today.

You’ve probably noticed, these fires seem to be occurring with an ominous, greater frequency than in the past.  They also are tending to burn with greater intensity.  I read we are fortunate this time around, it sounds like it is a lower temperature fire.

We all know Southern California rains and burns in cycles.  We will often go 8-10 years pretty dry, then get a good soaking.  Within that, every 15-20 years, it will be more than a soaking – it will be a thunderous wet El Niño hell for about three weeks.  Usually right after several hot, dry years.  But it has seemed that in the last five, ten years or so, the dry has been drier.

So more drier weather, less moisture in those plants up in the forest.  Things tend to burn hotter.  And those hotter temperatures of recent wildfires make recovery of our native habitats more difficult (even the ones that regenerate with fire are adapted to lower temperature, slower fires, believe it or not!), and the non-native material (that pretty fountain grass you see everywhere, mustard, castor bean, etc) that moves in pretty quickly is prone to be drier and burn hotter than even our native chaparral, keeping a downward habitat spiral alive.

Even in streams.  Streams are generally less fire-prone than the uplands, although they too will burn (just less).  I’ve heard some ecologists refer to steams as something like natural fire breaks.  Riparian (stream-side) plants aren’t generally adapted for fires – which means, they don’t generally get exposed to them.  Their higher water content in their leaves and branches generally protects them as well.  But consider that today:

“Riparian and wetland lowland habitats are at high risk from the fires, due to opportunistic exotic plants, including Giant reed (Arundo donax) and other non-native grasses and forbs”. (San Diego Wildfire Education Project)

So if you love hiking in streams but don’t know what all us creekfreaks get worked up about when we start ranting at the Arundo or Cape Ivy or Sticky Eupatorium or LA’s iconic Washingtonia palm tree (aka riparian Roman Candle) or that g@%$& fountain grass in the stream please understand:  this is a big part of why.  For example, on the Rio Grande in New Mexico, the increasing dominance of Russian Olive and Tamarisk (in part facilitated by decrease in natural flood cycles, due to levees – ok, it’s a long story) has resulted in devastating bosque fires, from which the native cottonwood trees aren’t generally regenerating.  You get habitat loss and nasty fires.

We can’t control the lightning strikes that start fires.  We could – but it would be a major political undertaking – control the potential risks caused by electrical utility lines.  And I don’t know if anyone can control kids playing with fire, workers with equipment that accidentally sparks or the myriad other “accidental” things that start fires(remember the heartbroken ranger who was burning letters? I’d hate to have to explain that to the boss).  We could (again p-o-l-i-t-i-c-al) stop building in wildlands, but I don’t know that we will (and in fairness – I totally fantasize about living in Topanga or a cabin up Baldy-way, so this is a conversation between pots and kettles).

But we can be responsible in our landscaping choices, we don’t have to recklessly landscape without knowing whether or not the latest thing at Home Depot is going to turn into the next high-tinder invasive weed nightmare.  We can choose to use native plants, or the non-natives that are demonstrated not to escape.  This is not obvious information, when it comes to landscapes, we generally only know what we are marketed.  It sounds counter-intuitive, but supporting our native habitats generally supports lower-intensity fires.  The San Gabriel Mountains on those steep slopes may not have a lot of the non-native material. It will be interesting to get ahold of the post-mortem of this fire, and see if any further correlations between fire intensity and vegetation type shows up.

In the meantime, stay safe.

______________________

Lotsa good reading on this topic:

The Fires This Time, Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers Watershed Council (LASGRWC)

Watershed-Wise:  Brush Clearance, Fuel Reduction, and Fire-safe Landscaping, LASGRWC

Watershed Council Symposia on these topics.

And because I’ve really, really got an axe to grind with fountain grass, an article about its evil cousin, the buffelgrass:

Bonfire of the Superweeds, High Country News

Tagged: , , , ,

§ 9 Responses to Invasive plants: like pouring oil on water – and setting it on fire.

  • Joe Linton says:

    The fires and what they say about humans is an important topic and I appreciate your coverage, Jessica. A couple other items worth reading that pertain to the fires:

    Ilsa Setziol has a couple of good pieces:
    on health precautions for kids breathing at this time – http://ramblingla.blogspot.com/2009/08/bonfire-insanity.html
    and on problems of development at the urban/wilderness interface –
    http://ramblingla.blogspot.com/2008/09/sparking-fires-nature-loving-southern.html

    and here’s a brief anecdote from http://www.harvestingrainwater.com Brad Lancaster’s “Water Harvesting for Drylands, Vol 2” page 320:
    “Greywater Harvesting helps create a fire-resistant oasis – Central Arizona”
    “Brian Thacker of Arizona Renewable Resources was prowling Google Earth studying the satelite images of the catastrophic Rodeo-Chedeski fires of June 2002 when he came upon something amazing. There in the middle of a charred landscape of burned pine trees he saw two green areas surrounding two undamaged homes – thriving oases amidst devastation. […] He found the homeowners did two key things.
    First, they used fire-defensive practices in their landscape. […]
    Second, the homeowners directed their greywater into the surrounding landscape, particularly the oasis zone around their homes. This supplied the native vegetation with enough moisture to keep it from igniting so it acted like a fire break around the homes.”

    This comment is getting long… maybe it deserves its own post? I don’t suggest (and don’t think that Lancaster suggests) that greywater is a panacea for preventing homes from burning when homes have been developed in places where they probably shouldn’t have been in the first place. But it seems to me (and this is something I’ve learned from Jessica – though don’t blame her if I’ve gotten it wrong or incomplete) that the fires may be symptomatic of desertification. We screwed up our streams, dried out our landscape… and the fires we’re witnessing burning is perhaps one more step downward in this vicious cycle.

    Re-use of greywater may help to add back in a few small steps missing in our water cycles… but, ultimately restoring streams and watersheds, even anadromous fish, will be what is needed to restore forest health, optimize fires locally, and indeed societal health, too.

  • Jessica Hall says:

    Good Info, Joe – maybe should be a follow up post. I think perennial and intermittent streams with high-water content vegetation probably help slow the spread of fires. I also don’t know the extent to which these higher elevation streams (in the mtns) have converted to drier streams from groundwater pumping. I doubt that – although they certainly do have altered hydrology and channel form due to dams, road building, veg clearance etc. There’s got to be experts out there that can tell us if the riparian zone has become narrower (or steeper) due to these alterations(I suspect they have), and whether or not that reduces the potential benefit of any natural fire damper caused by the higher water content vegetation. Gosh I hope that’s intelligible.

    All these things said, and my speculations about this as a low-intensity fire (at least as of yesterday afternoon) aside, there is no question that this is a huge fire of potentially catastrophic dimensions. Didn’t want anyone to walk away from this thinking I was somehow diminishing the seriousness of it.

  • […] Invasive plants: like pouring oil on water – and setting it on fire. « L.A. Cre… a few seconds ago from Twhirl […]

  • Carole says:

    Jessica, great article! I wish we could all boycott Home Depot (and Lowes and Walmart) until they stopped selling invasive plants. The environmental damage they cause is enormous, and so is the bill for attempting to control them or attempting to restore damaged ecosystems. Thank you for sharing this important information. And prayers for everyone living in the fires path.

  • […] Hall discusses the role of invasive plants in increasing wildfires. This is really frightening, and we each need to take responsibility for removing these plants from […]

  • Thank you for your valiant educational effort

    I represent a similar group which faces similar challenges in orange county

    It would be great to meet you and Joe at some point

  • […] Hall discusses the role of invasive plants in increasing wildfires. This is really frightening, and we each need to take responsibility for removing these plants from […]

  • There is nothing more instinctive than being comforted by the sound of running water, no matter the source.

  • […] LA Creek Freak: Invasive plants: like pouring oil on water – and setting it on fire […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading Invasive plants: like pouring oil on water – and setting it on fire. at L.A. Creek Freak.

meta

%d bloggers like this: